Ross Barkan writes: "It is not yet known who orchestrated the bombings. But New York City
is in a “heightened state of alert” and the various mayoral candidates
have blasted out statements expressing condolences for the victims’
families and reaffirmed their commitments, vaguely, to strong
anti-terrorist policies. While terrorism as an issue is always on the
minds of voters and the campaigns, it has, 12 years later, taken a
backseat in the mayoral race thus far, gaining less attention than paid
sick leave or stop-and-frisk, for example.
"That is about to change. It is far too early to say whether the
marathon bombing will loom over the race indefinitely (if it happened
closer to New York City, the answer would be an unequivocal “yes”). Yet
terrorism and public safety pertaining to threats beyond petty violence,
at least for now, will return to the forefront of the race.
"How a fairly liberal Democrat field balances their civil liberties
bona fides with strong anti-terrorist rhetoric will be fascinating to
watch. Depending on who the bombing suspects are, the issue of racial
profiling and NYPD surveillance could return to the forefront, too.
This Councilman Greenfield tweet:
It's tragic days like today that remind us of the important roles Mayors & Police Commissioners play during a crisis. #NYC2013And this tweet saying it helps Quinn and Lhota solidify lead:
— David G. Greenfield (@NYCGreenfield) April 15, 2013
This incident helps @chriscquinn on the democrat side @joelhota on republican side Stable and experience hands is important at such times
— Moshe Friedman (@moshe_friedman) April 15, 2013
No comments:
Post a Comment